<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BannedFoods.net &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bannedfoods.net/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bannedfoods.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Raw Cookie Dough cause of E. Coli outbreak?</title>
		<link>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/raw-cookie-dough-cause-of-e-coli-outbreak/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=raw-cookie-dough-cause-of-e-coli-outbreak</link>
		<comments>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/raw-cookie-dough-cause-of-e-coli-outbreak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banned Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recalled Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad dough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie dough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-coli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nestle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nestle recall cookie dough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raw cookie dough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recalled raw cookie dough]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bannedfoods.net/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By dan.mitchell It&#8217;s not known for sure yet whether Nestle Toll House cookies are to blame for an outbreak of E. coli that has sickened at least 66 people in 28 states, but it seems likely. &#8220;Many&#8221; of the afflicted people had eaten raw Toll House cookie dough, according to ABC News. Nestle has recalled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By dan.mitchell   </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not known for sure yet whether Nestle Toll House cookies are to blame for an outbreak of E. coli that has sickened at least 66 people in 28 states, but it seems likely. &#8220;Many&#8221; of the afflicted people had eaten raw Toll House cookie dough, according to ABC News.</p>
<p>Nestle has recalled the refrigerated product and warned people against eating it raw, as incredibly delicious as it might be. They shouldn&#8217;t eat it cooked either, the company said, until the source of the outbreak has been discovered. Cooking would normally kill the bacteria, but, of course, Nestle is taking no chances.<br />
<code><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-3095193421743727";
/* 180x150, created 6/19/09 */
google_ad_slot = "2755312365";
google_ad_width = 180;
google_ad_height = 150;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>The E. coli strain "has not been detected in our product," Nestle said in a statement announcing the recall. But people "who have purchased these products should not consume them. Instead, we are asking that consumers return these products to their local grocer for a full refund."</p>
<!-- AdSense Now! V1.98 -->
<!-- Post[count: 3] -->
<div class="adsense adsense-midtext" style="float:left;margin: 12px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-3095193421743727";
/* 300x250, created 1/10/10 */
google_ad_slot = "5209442572";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>Raw cookie dough is, to many of us, tastier than the cookies themselves, but Nestle advises on its packages that people shouldn't eat it raw.</p>
<p>Usually, though, it's OK to do so (or at least so we thought) with one exception: homemade raw cookie dough. As the people at WiseGeek point out, the homemade stuff contains raw eggs, which can pose a real danger.</p>
<p>The outbreak "points to the need for better funding for health surveillance," said lawyer Bill Marler, who sues food companies for a living. Oddly quoting himself on his blog, Marler wrote that the " 'fact that this outbreak was not detected until more than sixty people were ill in 28 states is precisely why we urgently need increased funding for the agencies responsible for public health,' said Marler. 'From the CDC to state and local health agencies, many dedicated people are working hard to protect consumers from tainted food, but they just don't have enough resources to do the job we ask of them.' "</p>
<p>Marler also posted a list of the particular products that have been recalled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/raw-cookie-dough-cause-of-e-coli-outbreak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is our food safe? Who is really watching out for food safety?</title>
		<link>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/is-our-food-safe-who-is-really-watching-out-for-food-safety/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-our-food-safe-who-is-really-watching-out-for-food-safety</link>
		<comments>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/is-our-food-safe-who-is-really-watching-out-for-food-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy banned foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmonella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsafe foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsafe foods pregnant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bannedfoods.net/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who really is watching our for food safety? Is our food really safe?
Large companies routinely rely on private audits to prove that their food is safe even though private auditors are dangerously incompetent, according to a New York Times investigation. The private auditor who inspected the Peanut Corporation of America plant responsible for unleashing the massive salmonella contamination was trained to audit bakeries and repeatedly gave the plant a "SUPERIOR" rating, partly because he "never thought that [salmonella] would survive in the peanut butter type environment."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Large companies routinely rely on private audits to prove that their food is safe even though private auditors are dangerously incompetent, according to a New York Times investigation. The private auditor who inspected the Peanut Corporation of America plant responsible for unleashing the massive salmonella contamination was trained to audit bakeries and repeatedly gave the plant a &#8220;SUPERIOR&#8221; rating, partly because he &#8220;never thought that [salmonella] would survive in the peanut butter type environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>    Audits are not required by the government, but food companies are increasingly requiring suppliers to undergo them as a way to ensure safety and minimize liability. The rigor of audits varies widely and many companies choose the cheapest ones, which cost as little as $1,000, in contrast to the $8,000 the Food and Drug Administration spends to inspect a plant.</p>
<p>    Typically, the private auditors inspect only manufacturing plants, not the suppliers that feed ingredients to those facilities. Nor do they commonly test the actual food products for pathogens, even though gleaming production lines can turn out poisoned fare.</p>
<p>    As in the Georgia peanut case, auditors are also usually paid by the food plants they inspect, which some experts said could deter them from cracking down. Yet food companies often point to an auditor&#8217;s certificate as a seal of approval.</p>
<p>    The baking institute, which is based in Manhattan, Kan., and is also known as AIB International, says it inspected more than 10,000 food production sites in 80 countries last year. James R. Munyon, its president and chief executive, said his group&#8217;s inspections were reliable and tough, no matter who pays for them, but he declined to elaborate on specific audits.</p>
<p>Even worse, employees with safety concerns are told to defer to the private audits.</p>
<p>Both the government and industry are aware of the problem. The government&#8217;s solution? &#8220;Expanding the role of private auditors to inspect the more than 200,000 foreign facilities that ship food to the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>    Robert A. LaBudde, a food safety expert who has consulted with food companies for 30 years, said, &#8220;The only thing that matters is productivity.&#8221; He added that &#8220;you only get in trouble if someone in the media traces it back to you, and that&#8217;s rare, like a meteor strike.&#8221;</p>
<p>    Dr. LaBudde said a sausage plant hired him five years ago to determine the species of bacillus plaguing its meat. But the owner then refused to complete the testing. &#8220;I called them ‘anthrax sausages,&#8217; and said they could be killing older people in the state, and still they wouldn&#8217;t do it,&#8221; he said, declining to name the company.</p>
<p>Food Safety Problems Slip Past Private Inspectors [The New York Times]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/is-our-food-safe-who-is-really-watching-out-for-food-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kelloggs Recalls more products tainted with salmonella from peanut butter</title>
		<link>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/289/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=289</link>
		<comments>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/289/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banned Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keebler branded Peanut Butter Sandwich Crackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keebler Soft Batch Homestyle Peanut Butter Cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peanut butter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmonella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soft Batch Homestyle Peanut Butter Cookies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bannedfoods.net/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More products recalled containing peanut butter. Kelloggs recalls products with salmonella. Keebler and Famous Amos part of recall.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-3095193421743727";
/* 468x60, created 1/18/09 */
google_ad_slot = "5703458446";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
// --></script><br />
<script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript"></script></code></p>
<p>WASHINGTON (AP) &#8211; What began as an investigation of bulk peanut butter  shipped to nursing homes and institutional cafeterias has broadened with the  Kellogg Co. (<a href="http://research.scottrade.com/public/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?id=1&amp;symbol=K">K</a>)  recalling 16 products and federal officials confirming salmonella contamination  at a Georgia facility that ships peanut products to 85 food companies</p>
<p>Kellogg had asked stores earlier this week to pull some of its venerable  Keebler crackers from shelves as a precaution. But in a statement late Friday  the Battle Creek, Mich., company announced it was voluntarily recalling the  crackers and other products in light of the problems in Georgia.</p>
<p>The nationwide salmonella outbreak has sickened hundreds of people in 43  states and killed at least six.</p>
<p>&#8220;The actions we are taking today are in keeping with our more than 100-year  commitment to providing consumers with safe, high-quality products,&#8221; said David  Mackay, Kellogg&#8217;s president and CEO. &#8220;We apologize for this unfortunate  situation.&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_290" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 170px"><img class="size-full wp-image-290" title="famous-amos-peanut-butter-cookies" src="http://bannedfoods.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/famous-amos-peanut-butter-cookies.jpg" alt="Recall Famous Amos Peanut Butter Cookies" width="160" height="160" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Recall Famous Amos Peanut Butter Cookies</p></div>
<p>The  recall includes Austin and Keebler branded Peanut Butter Sandwich Crackers, as  well as some snack-size packs of Famous Amos Peanut Butter Cookies and Keebler  Soft Batch Homestyle Peanut Butter Cookies.</p>
<p>Sandra Williams, a compliance officer with the Food and Drug Administration  in Detroit, advised consumers not to eat the products and to contact a doctor if  they have any symptoms. She also urged careful disposal of the tainted products  to avoid the risk of homeless people finding and eating them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kellogg reacted promptly to this potential public health risk after  receiving notification of the potential problem from their supplier,&#8221; Williams  said.</p>
<p>On Capitol Hill, the House Energy and Commerce Committee requested records as  it opened its own inquiry.</p>
<p>Although the investigation has gone into high gear, FDA officials say much of  their information remains sketchy. And new cases are still being reported.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a very active investigation, but we don&#8217;t yet have the data to  provide consumers with specifics about what brands or products they should  avoid,&#8221; said Stephen Sundlof, director of the FDA&#8217;s food safety center. Although  salmonella bacteria has been found at the Georgia plant, for example, more tests  are needed to see if it matches the strain that has made people sick.</p>
<p>The investigation includes not just peanut butter, but baked goods and other  products that contain peanuts and are sold directly to consumers. Health  officials say as many as one-third of the people who got sick did not recall  eating peanut butter.</p>
<p>&#8220;The focus is on peanut butter and a wide array of products that might have  peanut butter in them,&#8221; said Dr. Robert Tauxe, director of the foodborne illness  division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p>
<p>Officials said they are focusing on peanut paste, as well as peanut butter,  produced at a Blakely, Ga., facility owned by Peanut Corp. of America. The  concern about peanut paste is significant because it can be used in dozens of  products, from baked goods to cooking sauces.</p>
<p>Federal officials said they are focusing on 32 of the 85 companies that  Peanut Corp. supplies, because of the time period in which they received  shipments of peanut butter or paste. The companies are being urged to test their  products, or pull them from the shelves as Kellogg did.</p>
<p>The government is also scrutinizing a grower, raising the possibility that  contamination could have occurred before peanuts reached the processing plant,  which passed its last inspection by the Georgia agriculture this summer.</p>
<p>Peanut Corp. has recalled 21 lots of peanut butter made at the plant since  July 1 because of possible salmonella contamination. The company, which  suspended peanut butter processing at the facility, said none of its peanut  butter is sold directly to consumers but is distributed to institutions, food  service industries and private label food companies.</p>
<p>But Kellogg Co., which gets some peanut paste from the Blakely facility,  asked stores late Wednesday to stop selling some of its Keebler and Austin  peanut butter sandwich crackers. The company said it hasn&#8217;t received any reports  of illnesses.</p>
<p>Peanut Corp. said it is cooperating with federal and state authorities. On  Friday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee wrote the company requesting  inspection and internal records dating back four years.</p>
<p>Health officials in Minnesota and Virginia have linked two deaths each to the  outbreak and Idaho and North Carolina have reported one. Four of those five were  elderly people, and all had salmonella when they died, though their exact causes  of death haven&#8217;t been determined. But the CDC said the salmonella may have  contributed.</p>
<p>The CDC said the bacteria behind the outbreak &#8211; typhimurium &#8211; is common and  not an unusually dangerous strain but that the elderly or those with weakened  immune systems are more at risk.</p>
<p>The salmonella outbreak is the second in two years involving peanut butter.  Salmonella is the nation&#8217;s leading cause of food poisoning; common symptoms  include diarrhea, fever and abdominal cramps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/289/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Chinese go on trial for selling melamine.</title>
		<link>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/6-chinese-go-on-trial-for-selling-melamine/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=6-chinese-go-on-trial-for-selling-melamine</link>
		<comments>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/6-chinese-go-on-trial-for-selling-melamine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America Melamine Scare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banned foods melamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foods with melamine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bannedfoods.net/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six Chinese suspects went on trial Friday accused of making and selling the industrial chemical at the center of a tainted milk scandal blamed for killing six children and sickening nearly 300,000 others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="hn-articlebody" class="g-unit hn-copy">
<p class="hn-byline">By  SCOTT MCDONALD</p>
<p>BEIJING (AP) — Six Chinese suspects went on trial Friday accused of making and selling the industrial chemical at the center of a tainted milk scandal blamed for killing six children and sickening nearly 300,000 others.</p>
<p>Among those in court Friday was the owner of a workshop that was allegedly the country&#8217;s largest source of melamine, the substance responsible for the health crisis that also saw Chinese food products pulled from stores worldwide, state media said.</p>
<p>Police say Zhang Yujun, 40, ran a workshop on the outskirts of Jinan in eastern Shandong province that manufactured and sold a &#8220;protein powder&#8221; composed mainly of melamine and malt dextrin, the official Xinhua News Agency reported. The powder was added to watered-down milk to make it appear higher in protein content.</p>
<p>Prosecutors in the Shijiazhuang Intermediate People&#8217;s Court accused Zhang of producing 776 tons of the additive powder from October 2007 through August 2008, making it the largest source of melamine in the country. He allegedly sold more than 600 tons with a total value of 6.83 million yuan ($1 million), the court heard.</p>
<p>In the same case, a second man, Zhang Yanzhang, 24, was accused of buying and reselling 230 tons of powder to others.</p>
<p>State television showed both men in court in handcuffs with their heads bowed while being questioned by three judges. It was not immediately clear what penalties they face.</p>
<p>An official at the publicity office of Hebei Supreme Court confirmed that the trial started Friday but refused to give his name or other details.</p>
<p>Four other men were being tried in three separate courts across Hebei province for adding the chemical to raw milk and then selling it to Sanlu Group Co., the main company in the scandal, according to Xinhua.</p>
<p>Melamine can artificially inflate protein levels and was apparently added to watered-down milk to fool quality inspectors while boosting profits.</p>
<p>Zhang Heshe and Zhang Taizhen were accused of adding 77 pounds (35 kilograms) of the &#8220;protein powder&#8221; to 70 tons of raw milk and then selling it to Sanlu. Yang Jingmin and Gu Guoping were also charged with adding 53 pounds (24 kilograms) and 37 pounds (16.7 kilograms) of melamine, respectively.</p>
<p>The verdicts will be announced at an unspecified date, Xinhua reported.</p>
<p>The dairy company Sanlu, based in Shijiazhuang, confirmed earlier this week that it was bankrupt.</p>
<p>Xinhua reported Thursday that Sanlu has 1.1 billion yuan ($160 million) of net debt and that a branch of the Shijiazhuang City Commercial Bank was the creditor that applied to a court to have Sanlu declared bankrupt.</p>
<p>It said the intermediate court in Shijiazhuang had accepted the filing. Xinhua said Sanlu owes a creditor 902 million yuan ($132 million) it borrowed earlier this month to pay for the medical treatment of children sickened after drinking the company&#8217;s infant formula and for compensation of the babies&#8217; families.</p>
<p>Wang Jianguo, spokesman for the Shijiazhuang city government, said the money was given to the China Dairy Industry Association for medical care and compensation fees for victims, according to a transcript of a news conference he gave Thursday.</p>
<p>A woman who answered the phone Friday at the association refused to answer any questions.</p>
<p>The issue of compensation for the families of the children sickened or killed has become a sensitive one, with courts so far not accepting any lawsuits filed by the families.</p>
<p>The Legal Daily newspaper reported that Tian Wenhua, Sanlu&#8217;s chairwoman and general manager, would go on trial Wednesday in Shijiazhuang for &#8220;selling fake and shoddy products.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sanlu, like a number of major Chinese dairies, had been exempt from government inspections because it was deemed to have superior quality controls — until high levels of the industrial chemical melamine were found in its baby formula and other products in September. Several other dairies were also found to have sold tainted goods.</p>
<p>Melamine poses little danger in small amounts, but larger doses can cause kidney stones and renal failure.</p>
<p>Sanlu is 43 percent-owned by New Zealand daily cooperative Fonterra Group.</p></div>
<p><code><a href="http://technorati.com/claim/g9kq5dvqxg" rel="me">Technorati Profile</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/6-chinese-go-on-trial-for-selling-melamine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chocolate Pirate Gold Coins found with melamine (sold in some Costco&#8217;s)</title>
		<link>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/chocolate-pirate-gold-coins-found-with-melamine-sold-in-some-costcos/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=chocolate-pirate-gold-coins-found-with-melamine-sold-in-some-costcos</link>
		<comments>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/chocolate-pirate-gold-coins-found-with-melamine-sold-in-some-costcos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banned Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Dye 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco Chocolate coins melamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melamine banned foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melamine gold coin candy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate gold coins banned]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bannedfoods.net/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer Advisory Sherwood Brands Pirate&#8217;s Gold Milk Chocolate Coins may be Contaminated with Melamine Melamine &#8211; Certain products from China &#8211; 2008 Main Page &#124; Report on Testing Results OTTAWA, October 8, 2008 – The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is warning the public not to consume, distribute, or sell the Sherwood Brands Pirate’s Gold [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_107" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 119px"><a href="http://bannedfoods.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/sherwood-gold-choc-coins.png"><img src="http://bannedfoods.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/sherwood-gold-choc-coins.png" alt="Sherwood Gold Coins found with melamine" title="sherwood-gold-choc-coins" width="109" height="110" class="size-medium wp-image-107" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sherwood Gold Coins found with melamine</p></div><br />
Consumer Advisory<br />
Sherwood Brands Pirate&#8217;s Gold Milk Chocolate Coins may be Contaminated with Melamine<br />
Melamine &#8211; Certain products from China &#8211; 2008<br />
Main Page | Report on Testing Results</p>
<p>OTTAWA, October 8, 2008 – The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is warning the public not to consume, distribute, or sell the Sherwood Brands Pirate’s Gold Milk Chocolate Coins described below. This product is being recalled due to positive test results for melamine conducted by the CFIA.<br />
<code><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-3095193421743727";
/* 200x200, created 10/15/08 */
google_ad_slot = "4994685917";
google_ad_width = 200;
google_ad_height = 200;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>The affected product, Sherwood Brands Pirate’s Gold Milk Chocolate Coins, is sold in 840g containers containing 240 pieces per container bearing UPC 0 36077 11240 7 and lot code 1928S1.</p>
<p>This product is sold nationally through Costco stores and may also have been sold in bulk packages or as individual pieces at various dollar and bulk stores across Canada.</p>
<p>If the original product identity and UPC code is not evident, consumers are advised to check with their retailer to determine if they have the affected product.</p>
<p>Retailers and distributors are advised to stop distributing Sherwood Brands Pirate’s Gold Milk Chocolate Coins and to initiate a voluntary recall of this product. The CFIA will be working with the importers to remove the affected product from the marketplace.</p>
<p>There have been no reported illnesses associated with the consumption of these products.</p>
<p>Although the health risk associated with these products is considered to be low, the advisory is being issued as a result of the Government of Canada’s ongoing investigation into milk and milk-derived products sourced in/from China that may have been distributed in Canada.</p>
<p>The CFIA is monitoring the effectiveness of the recall.</p>
<p>Melamine is a chemical compound used in a number of commercial and industrial applications.  Canada does not allow its use as a food ingredient.</p>
<p>For more information consumers and industry can call the CFIA at 1-800-442-2342 / TTY 1-800-465-7735 (8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern time, Monday to Friday).</p>
<p>For information on receiving recalls by e-mail, or for other food safety facts, visit our web site at www.inspection.gc.ca.</p>
<div id="attachment_132" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://bannedfoods.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/thumb-bfn2.jpg"><img src="http://bannedfoods.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/thumb-bfn2-300x132.jpg" alt="Banned Foods.net Stay Informed" title="thumb-bfn2" width="300" height="132" class="size-medium wp-image-132" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Banned Foods.net Stay Informed</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bannedfoods.net/uncategorized/chocolate-pirate-gold-coins-found-with-melamine-sold-in-some-costcos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

